A comparison of two methods for measuring the signal to noise ratio on MR images
- 22 November 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by IOP Publishing in Physics in Medicine & Biology
- Vol. 44 (12) , N261-N264
- https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/44/12/403
Abstract
The signal to noise ratio (SNR) is one of the important measures of the performance of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system. The object of this study was to compare a single acquisition method, which estimates the noise from background pixels, with a dual acquisition method which estimates the noise from the subtraction of two sequentially acquired images. The dual acquisition method is more exact, but is slower to perform and requires image manipulation. A comparison between the two methods gave a good correlation, and a regression equation of SNRsingle = 1.1+0.94 SNRdual. The single acquisition method is therefore appropriate for use in a quality assurance programme, since it is quicker and simpler to perform and is a good indicator of the more exact measure.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Signal-to-noise ratio in MRI.The British Journal of Radiology, 1998
- Estimation of the Noise in Magnitude MR ImagesMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 1998
- The absolute signal-to-noise ratio in MRI acceptance testingThe British Journal of Radiology, 1996
- Sources of intensity nonuniformity in spin echo images at 1.5 TMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1994
- II. Performance assessment and quality control in MRI by Eurospin test objects and protocolsMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 1993
- Correction of intensity nonuniformity in MR images of any orientationMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 1993
- Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: Report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance Task Group No. 1Medical Physics, 1990
- Measuring signal-to-noise ratios in MR imaging.Radiology, 1989
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986