A reliable method for monitoring intraabdominal pressure during natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery
- 7 February 2007
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 21 (4) , 672-676
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9124-5
Abstract
Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) provides surgical access to the peritoneal cavity without skin incisions. The NOTES procedure requires pneumoperitoneum for visualization and manipulation of abdominal organs, similar to laparoscopy. Accurate measurement of the pneumoperitoneum pressure is essential to avoid potentially deleterious effects of intraabdominal compartment syndrome. A reliable method for monitoring pneumoperitoneum pressures during NOTES has not been identified. This study evaluated several methods of monitoring intraabdominal pressures with a standard gastroscope during NOTES. Four female pigs (25 kg) were sedated, and a single-channel gastroscope was passed transgastrically into the peritoneal cavity. Pneumoperitoneum was achieved via a pressure insufflator through a percutaneous, intraperitoneal 14-gauge catheter. Three other pressures were recorded via separate catheters. First, a 14-gauge percutaneous catheter passed intraperitoneally measured true intraabdominal pressure. Second, a 14-gauge tube attached to the endoscope was used to measure endoscope tip pressure. The third pressure transducer was connected directly to the accessory channel of the endoscope. The abdomen was insufflated to a range of pressures (10–30 mmHg), and simultaneous pressures were recorded from all three pressure sensors. Pressure correlation curves were developed for all animals across all intraperitoneal pressures (mean error, –4.25 to –1 mmHg). Endoscope tip pressures correlated with biopsy channel pressures (R 2 = 0.99). Biopsy channel and endoscope tip pressures fit a least-squares linear model to predict actual intraabdominal pressure (R = 0.99 for both). Both scope tip and biopsy channel port pressures were strongly correlative with true intraabdominal pressures (R 2 = 0.98 and R 2 = 0.99, respectively). This study demonstrates that monitoring pressure through an endoscope is reliable and predictive of true intraabdominal pressure. Gastroscope pressure monitoring is a useful adjunct to NOTES. Future NOTES procedures should incorporate continuous intraabdominal pressure monitoring to avoid the potentially deleterious effects of pneumoperitoneum during NOTES. This can be achieved by the integration of pressure-monitoring capabilities into gastroscopes.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Primer on Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery: Building a New ParadigmSurgical Innovation, 2006
- Randomized clinical trial of the effect of pneumoperitoneum on cardiac function and haemodynamics during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Br J Surg 2004; 91: 848-854)British Journal of Surgery, 2005
- Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndromeBritish Journal of Surgery, 2004
- Effects of pneumoperitoneum on intraoperative pulmonary mechanics and gas exchange during laparoscopic gastric bypassSurgical Endoscopy, 2003
- Renal hemodynamics during carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneumSurgical Endoscopy, 2002
- The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgerySurgical Endoscopy, 2002
- Hemodynamic and pulmonary changes during open, carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum, and abdominal wall-lifting cholecystectomySurgical Endoscopy, 2001
- Effect of increased intraabdominal pressure on cardiac output and tissue blood flow assessed by color-labeled microspheres in the pigSurgical Endoscopy, 2001
- Guidelines for diagnostic laparoscopySurgical Endoscopy, 1999
- Cardiovascular, pulmonary, and renal effects of massively increased intra-abdominal pressure in critically ill patientsCritical Care Medicine, 1989