Comparison between Sodium Aurothiomalate and Auranofin in Rheumatoid Arthritis:Results of a Two-year Open Randomized Study
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology
- Vol. 16 (3) , 177-184
- https://doi.org/10.3109/03009748709165271
Abstract
We compared the effectiveness of Auranofin, and sodium aurothiomalate (SATM) given for 2 years to patients with rheumatoid arthritis. This was an open trial with randomized entry to 2 treatment groups of 60 patients each. Only 40% of patients completed 2 years of treatment but these showed significant improvement in their indices of disease activity. Adverse reactions were a more common reason for withdrawal from SATM than from Auranofin, while insufficient therapeutic response was more common with Auranofin. This study also shows that inefficacy, toxicity, complicating illnesses, and lack of compliance limit the beneficial outcome of long-term chrysotherapy.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- A rheumatological dilemma: is it possible to modify the course of rheumatoid arthritis? Can we answer the question?Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1985
- Outcome assessment in clinical trials evidence for the sensitivity of a health status measureArthritis & Rheumatism, 1984
- Comparison of auranofin, gold sodium thiomalate, and placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1983
- Sample Size Nomograms For Interpreting Negative Clinical StudiesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1983
- Preliminary criteria for clinical remission in rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1981
- Gold Salts in the Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1974
- A Controlled Trial of Gold Salt Therapy in Rheumatoid ArthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1973
- Gold Therapy in Rheumatoid ArthritisAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1960