Comparison of treatment response classifications between unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric measurements of metastatic lung lesions on chest computed tomography1

This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:

• CT Tumor Measurement for Therapeutic Response Assessment: Comparison of Unidimensional, Bidimensional, and Volumetric Techniques—Initial Observations
  Radiology, 2002
• Gross tumor volume, critical prognostic factor in patients treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for non-small-cell lung carcinoma
  International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2002
• Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST): New guidelines
  Medical and Pediatric Oncology, 2001
• Tumor size on computed tomography scans
  Cancer, 2001
• The influence of total dose and tumor volume on local control and survival in non small cell lung cancer
  International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2000
• Small Pulmonary Nodules: Volumetrically Determined Growth Rates Based on CT Evaluation
  Radiology, 2000
• Accuracy of Volume Measurement Using Helical CT
  Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1997
• Size quantification of liver metastases in patients undergoing cancer treatment: reproducibility of one-, two-, and three-dimensional measurements determined with spiral CT.
  Radiology, 1997
• Method for segmenting chest CT image data using an anatomical model: preliminary results
  IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 1997
• The Impact of 2D Versus 3D Quantitation of Tumor Bulk Determination on Current Methods of Assessing Response to Treatment
  Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1996