Accuracy of point predictions in survival analysis
- 3 October 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 20 (20) , 3083-3096
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.913
Abstract
Survival time prediction is important in many applications, particularly for patients diagnosed with terminal diseases. A measure of prediction error taken from the medical literature is advocated as a practicable method of quantifying reliability of point predictions. Optimum predictions are derived for familiar survival models and the accuracy of these predictions is investigated. We argue that poor predictive capability is inherent to standard survival models with realistic parameter values. A lung cancer example is used to illustrate difficulties in prediction in practice. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Extent and determinants of error in doctors' prognoses in terminally ill patients: prospective cohort study Commentary: Why do doctors overestimate? Commentary: Prognoses should be based on proved indices not intuitionBMJ, 2000
- Prediction of early death in end-stage renal disease patients starting dialysisAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 1997
- Prognosis in lung cancer: physicians' opinions compared with outcome and a predictive model.Thorax, 1996
- Survival of Medicare Patients after Enrollment in Hospice ProgramsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- How long have I got doctor?European Journal Of Cancer, 1994
- Effects of frailty in survival analysisStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 1994
- Further results on the non‐parametric linear regression model in survival analysisStatistics in Medicine, 1993
- The explained variation in proportional hazards regressionBiometrika, 1990
- Measures of dependence for censored survival dataBiometrika, 1988
- Accuracy of Predictions of Survival in Later Stages of CancerBMJ, 1972