Planning Under New Federalism Coping with Conflicting Roles
- 1 April 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of the American Planning Association
- Vol. 47 (2) , 175-184
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368108977102
Abstract
Planners involved in administering local programs funded by the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program are often confronted with a dilemma: they are expected to coordinate the activities of line agencies in the interests of better management, yet they also serve as a link to citizens groups and formal citizen advisory boards which may resist efforts at making local administration more rational. Case studies discussed herein show a number of responses planners have and can make to this dilemma. Evidence suggests that planners must develop a strategy to avoid being caught in the middle of conflicts between citizens and line agencies.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Local Implementation Decisions for Community Development Block GrantsPublic Administration Review, 1979
- Critical Unresolved Problems of Urban Planning AnalysisJournal of the American Institute of Planners, 1978
- Urban Planners: Doctors or Midwives?Public Administration Review, 1977
- Power, Expertise and the "Tecnico": Suggestions from a Mexican Case StudyThe Journal of Politics, 1977
- Professional Fiefdoms Appraised: The Case of Social ServicesPublius: The Journal of Federalism, 1976