Screening for lung cancer
- 6 September 1999
- reference entry
- Published by Wiley
- No. 3,p. CD001991
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001991
Abstract
The effectiveness of screening for lung cancer with chest radiography, sputum cytology or spiral CT has not been established. To determine whether screening for lung cancer using regular sputum examinations or chest radiography or CT chest reduces lung cancer mortality. Electronic databases, bibliographies, hand searching of a journal and discussion with experts were used to identify published and unpublished trials. Controlled trials of screening for lung cancer using sputum examinations, chest radiography or CT chest. Intention to screen analysis was performed. Where there was significant statistical heterogeneity relative risks were reported using the random effect model, but for other outcomes the fixed effect model was used. Seven trials were included (6 randomised controlled studies and 1 non-randomised controlled trial) with a total of 245,610 subjects. There were no studies with an unscreened control group. Frequent screening with chest x-rays was associated with an 11% relative increase in mortality from lung cancer compared with less frequent screening (RR 1.11, CI: 1.00-1.23). A non statistically significant trend was observed to reduced mortality from lung cancer when screening with chest x-ray and sputum cytology was compared with chest x-ray alone (RR 0.88, CI:0.74-1.03). Several of the included studies had potential methodological weaknesses. There were no controlled studies of spiral CT. The current evidence does not support screening for lung cancer with chest radiography or sputum cytology. Frequent chest x-ray screening might be harmful. Further, methodologically rigorous trials are required.Keywords
This publication has 72 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screeningThe Lancet, 1999
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Screening for lung cancer: The Mayo lung project revisitedCancer, 1993
- Lack of benefit from semi‐annual screening for cancer of the lung: Follow‐up report of a randomized controlled trial on a population of high‐risk males in czechoslovakiaInternational Journal of Cancer, 1990
- Multiphasic Health Checkup Evaluation: A 16-year follow-upJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986
- Bias in Treatment Assignment in Controlled Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Cancer of the LungCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1980
- Evaluating periodic multiphasic health checkups: A controlled trialJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1979
- Preliminary report of the lung cancer detection program in New YorkCancer, 1977
- Earlier diagnosis and survival in lung cancerBMJ, 1969