Steerable Sheath Catheter Navigation for Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: A Case‐Control Study
- 9 July 2008
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 31 (7) , 863-873
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01101.x
Abstract
Background: Lack of stable access to all desired ablation target sites is one of the limitations for efficacious circumferential left atrial (LA) pulmonary vein (PV) ablation. Targeting that, new catheter navigation technologies have been developed. The aim of this study was to describe atrial fibrillation (AF) mapping and ablation using manually controlled steerable sheath catheter navigation and to compare it against an ablation approach with a nonsteerable sheath. Methods and Results: In this case‐control‐analysis 245 consecutive patients (controls) treated with circumferential left atrial PV ablation were matched with 105 subsequently consecutive patients (cases) ablated with a similar line concept but mapping and ablation performed with a manually controlled steerable sheath. One hundred sixty‐six patients were selected to be included into 83 matched patient pairs. Ablation success was measured with serial 7‐day Holter electrocardiograms. Patients ablated with the steerable sheath showed an increase in the success rate (freedom from AF) from 56% to 77% (P = 0.009) after a single procedure and 6 months of follow‐up. With respect to procedural data no difference could be found for procedure time, fluoroscopy time, irradiation dose, and radiofrequency (RF) burning time. With the steerable sheath mean procedural RF power (33 ± 9 vs 41 ± 4 W; P < 0.0005) and total RF energy delivery (97,498 vs 111,864 J; P < 0.005) were significantly lower and the rate of complete PV isolation significantly increased from 10% to 52% (P < 0.0005). The complication rate was the same in both groups. Among different arrhythmia, procedure, and patient characteristics, the lack of early postinterventional arrhythmia recurrences was the only but powerful predictor for long‐term ablation success. Conclusions: An AF mapping and ablation approach solely using a manually controlled steerable sheath for catheter navigation improved the outcome of circumferential left atrial PV ablation at similar intervention times and similar complication rates. The 6‐month success rate after a single LA intervention increased from 56% to 77%.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Acute Results of Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Using a Single Mesh CatheterJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2009
- Novel Robotic Catheter Remote Control System: Feasibility and Safety of Transseptal Puncture and Endocardial Catheter NavigationJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2006
- Robotic Magnetic Navigation for Atrial Fibrillation AblationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2006
- Electroanatomic reconstruction of the left atrium, pulmonary veins, and esophagus compared with the “true anatomy” on multislice computed tomography in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillationHeart Rhythm, 2006
- Value of Different Follow‐Up Strategies to Assess the Efficacy of Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Ablation for the Curative Treatment of Atrial FibrillationJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2005
- Randomized comparison of encircling and nonencircling left atrial ablation for chronic atrial fibrillationHeart Rhythm, 2005
- Freedom From Atrial Tachyarrhythmias After Catheter Ablation of Atrial FibrillationCirculation, 2005
- Incidence and Prevention of Cardiac Tamponade Complicating Ablation for Atrial FibrillationPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2005
- Complete Isolation of Left Atrium Surrounding the Pulmonary VeinsCirculation, 2004
- Specific linear left atrial lesions in atrial fibrillationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2002