SCALING PIGEONS' CHOICE OF FEEDS: BIGGER IS BETTER
- 1 July 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 60 (1) , 203-217
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1993.60-203
Abstract
Preferences of hungry pigeons among 10 grains and pellets were analyzed using a Thurstone scaling procedure. The recovered scales were positively correlated with size of the feed. The correlations improved when the Thurstonian assumption of equal-sized discriminal dispersions (Case V) was replaced with the assumption of proportional-sized dispersions (Case VI), as entailed by Weber's law. The correlations weakened when the experiments were conducted with the pigeons close to their free-feeding weights, where the probability of sampling alternative grains increased. In the final experiment, exposure to a large pellet shifted the preferences between two smaller pellets.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Working Harder for Less: Effect of Incentive Value on Force of Instrumental Response in HumansThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 1993
- Selective attention and search images in pigeons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1991
- Individual differences in choice of food items by pigeonsBehavioural Processes, 1987
- Substitutability in time allocation.Psychological Review, 1980
- Seed Selection in Some North American FinchesOrnithological Applications, 1971
- Theory of Feeding StrategiesAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1971
- Seed Selection By PigeonsBehaviour, 1969
- On the use of inconsistency of preferences in psychological measurement.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1958
- Psychological scaling without a unit of measurement.Psychological Review, 1950
- Studies in Affective PsychologyThe American Journal of Psychology, 1928