Incorporating turn-over in whole body protein retention ef.ciency in pigs
- 1 February 2005
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Animal Science
- Vol. 80 (1) , 71-81
- https://doi.org/10.1079/asc40650071
Abstract
The magnitude of the discrepancy between conventional regression estimates of protein retention efficiency and theoretical estimates of synthesis efficiency indicates a major contribution ascribable to protein turn-over in the generally accepted estimates. As protein turn-over is known to be influenced by diet, feeding level and degree of maturity, this suggests the development of an estimator of protein efficiency that can be adapted for such differences. Therefore, based on generally accepted formulas for growth description, a method of estimating protein retention efficiency was developed which is flexible enough to accommodate different diets, feeding levels and degrees of maturity. Moreover, a formula was derived to convert one type of estimate to the other by regarding constant efficiency as equivalent to variable efficiency at the mid point of the estimation interval. Increase in scientific depth to this descriptive approach is provided by a theoretical consideration of a possible mechanism of hormonal control of protein synthesis and breakdown, ultimately expressed as proportionalities to powers of whole body protein (P). Molecular considerations on cellular synthesis and breakdown indicate a difference between breakdown and synthesis powers equal to (2/9)Q. The factor (2/9) is indicated by an argument based on insulinlike growth factor derived activator diffusion attributes by nucleus and body tissue geometries, whileQis equal to the proportion of nuclei activated by insulin-like growth factor. This proportion is likely to be a function of the concentration of growth factor in the blood. Hence, a linear relationship between intake and blood insulin-like growth factor concentration suggests thatQcan be represented by a scaled transformation of intake, 0 ≤Q≤ 1, such that a value ofQ= 1 represents ad libitum intake on a suitable diet andQ= 0 intake at the maintenance requirement. The quantification of breakdown and synthesis power differences by (2/9)Qleads to kP= {1 + [1 − (P/α)(2/9)Q]−1/6}−1, for turn-over related protein retention efficiency (kP), with α the limit value of P at maturity, so that 0 ≤ (P/α) ≤ 1. Experimental estimates, derived from direct estimates of whole body protein synthesis and breakdown at predetermined levels of intake, are in excellent agreement with the theoretical (2/9)Qin the power associated with (P/α) in kP. Furthermore, conventional multiple regression retention efficiencies satisfactorily approximate the turn-over related retention efficiency that can be calculated at a given level of intake for the mid point of the interval covered by the regression estimates.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of energy intake on the performance of different types of pig from 45 to 100 kg body weight. 1. Protein and lipid depositionAnimal Science, 1996
- The Allometry of Growth and ReproductionJournal of Animal Ecology, 1990
- Signal transmission by the insulin-like growth factorsCell, 1989
- Effects of changes in the intakes of protein and non-protein energy on whole-body protein turnover in growing pigsBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1981
- Protein turnover in growing pigs. Effects of age and food intakeBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1980
- THE INFLUENCE OF DIETARY ENERGY CONCENTRATION ON THE GROWTH EFFICIENCY OF AD LIB. FED PIGSPublished by Elsevier ,1980
- SOME ASPECTS OF THE ENERGY METABOLISM OF GROWING PIGS FED ON DIETS CONTAINING DIFFERENT CONCENTRATIONS OF PROTEINPublished by Elsevier ,1980
- Theoretical aspects of a flexible model to stimulate protein and lipid growth in pigsAnimal Science, 1976
- Quantitative changes in DNA, RNA, and protein during prenatal and postnatal growth in the ratDevelopmental Biology, 1965
- A Flexible Growth Function for Empirical UseJournal of Experimental Botany, 1959