Crucial differences between developmental cognitive neuroscience and adult neuropsychology
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Developmental Neuropsychology
- Vol. 13 (4) , 513-524
- https://doi.org/10.1080/87565649709540693
Abstract
It is argued that the static adult neuropsychological model is inappropriate for explaining the development of many atypical children whose brains cannot be considered in terms of a normal brain with parts intact and parts impaired. Rather, their brains develop differently from normal children from the very outset. I illustrate this with two examples from Williams syndrome, showing how equivalent behavioral outcomes stem from different underlying processes.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Word learning in a special population: do individuals with Williams syndrome obey lexical constraints?Journal of Child Language, 1997
- Phonological Short-term Memory and its Relationship to Language in Williams SyndromeCognitive Neuropsychiatry, 1997
- Language and Williams Syndrome: How Intact Is "Intact"?Child Development, 1997
- LIM–kinase deleted in Williams syndromeNature Genetics, 1996
- LIM-kinase1 Hemizygosity Implicated in Impaired Visuospatial Constructive CognitionCell, 1996
- Is There a Social Module? Language, Face Processing, and Theory of Mind in Individuals with Williams SyndromeJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1995
- The role of child maltreatment in early deviations in cognitive and affective processing abilities and later peer relationship problemsDevelopment and Psychopathology, 1995
- Cytoarchitectonic anomalies in a genetically based disorderNeuroReport, 1994
- Hemizygosity at the elastin locus in a developmental disorder, Williams syndromeNature Genetics, 1993
- A cognitive and behavioural phenotype in williams syndromeJournal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 1991