Stabilization of tearing modes to suppress major disruptions in tokamaks
Open Access
- 1 October 1979
- journal article
- Published by IOP Publishing in Nuclear Fusion
- Vol. 19 (10) , 1333-1342
- https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/19/10/005
Abstract
It is shown, for q-profiles which lead to a disruption, that the control of the amplitude of the 2/1 tearing mode avoids the disruption, q-profiles measured in T–4 and PLT before a major disruption have been studied. Two methods of controlling the 2/1 mode amplitude have been considered: 1) Feedback stabilization with the feedback signal locked in phase with the 2/1 mode. The major disruption is suppressed if the feedback parameters (time delay and gain) are properly chosen. Otherwise, only a delay in the disruption is observed. 2) Heating slightly outside the q = 2 surface. Modifying the current density profile can decrease, and even eliminate, the 2/1 –3/2 interaction. In this way, the disruption is avoided. –In both cases it is only necessary to decrease the 2/1 mode amplitude to suppress the disruption. It is not always necessary to stabilize the unstable modes fully.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mechanism for Major Disruptions in TokamaksPhysical Review Letters, 1978
- A study of disruptive instabilities in the PLT tokamak using X-ray techniquesNuclear Fusion, 1978
- Magnetic reconnection and m = 1 oscillations in current carrying plasmasAnnals of Physics, 1978
- Simulation of Large Magnetic Islands: A Possible Mechanism for a Major Tokamak DisruptionPhysical Review Letters, 1977
- Stabilization of Resistive Kink Modes in the TokamakPhysical Review Letters, 1977
- Non-linear growth of the m = 1 tearing modeNuclear Fusion, 1976
- Tearing mode in the cylindrical tokamakPhysics of Fluids, 1973