Risk assessment for criteria pollutants vs. other non‐carcinogens: The difference between implicit and explicit conservatism
- 1 September 1997
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal
- Vol. 3 (4) , 617-626
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039709383716
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Noncancer Risk Assessment: A Probabilistic Alternative to Current PracticeHuman and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 1996
- Environmental lead and children's intelligence: a systematic review of the epidemiological evidenceBMJ, 1994
- Blood lead levels in the US population. Phase 1 of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III, 1988 to 1991)Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- Respiratory Response of Humans Exposed to Low Levels of Ozone for 6.6 HoursArchives of environmental health, 1991
- Ozone Concentration and Pulmonary Response Relationships for 6.6-Hour Exposures with Five Hours of Moderate Exercise to 0.08, 0.10, and 0.12 ppmAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1990
- Lead Exposure and Child DevelopmentPublished by Springer Nature ,1989
- Reference dose (RfD): Description and use in health risk assessmentsRegulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 1988
- Pulmonary Function and Symptom Responses after 6.6-Hour Exposure to 0.12 ppm Ozone with Moderate ExerciseJAPCA, 1988
- The use of scientific information in setting ambient air standards.Environmental Health Perspectives, 1983
- Regulatory history and experimental support of uncertainty (safety) factorsRegulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 1983