Chronic Exposure to a GSM-like Signal (Mobile Phone) Does Not Stimulate the Development of DMBA-Induced Mammary Tumors in Rats: Results of Three Consecutive Studies

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Bartsch, H., Bartsch, C., Seebald, E., Deerberg, F., Dietz, K., Vollrath, L. and Mecke, D. Chronic Exposure to a GSM-like Signal (Mobile Phone) does not Stimulate the Development of DMBA-Induced Mammary Tumors in Rats: Results of Three Consecutive Studies. Radiat. Res. 157, 183–190 (2002).Certain epidemiological and experimental studies raised concerns about the safety of radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields because of a possible increased risk of leukemia and lymphoma. In this study, an RF field used in mobile telecommunication was tested using 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA)-induced mammary tumors in female Sprague-Dawley rats as a model for human breast cancer. Three experiments were carried out under strictly standardized conditions and were started on the same day of three consecutive years. The field consisted of a GSM-like signal (900 MHz pulsed at 217 Hz, pulse width 577 μs) of relatively low power flux density (100 μW/cm2 ± 3 dB) and was applied continuously throughout each experiment to freely moving animals. The specific absorption rates averaged over the whole body were 17.5–70 mW/kg. The highest values in young animals were at or around the exposure limit permissible for the general public (i.e. 80 mW/kg). The animals were palpated weekly for the presence of mammary tumors and were killed humanely when tumors reached a diameter of 1–2 cm to allow a reliable histopathological classification and a distinction between malignant and benign subtypes. The overall results of the three studies are that there was no statistically significant effect of RF-field exposure on tumor latency and that the cumulative tumor incidence at the end of the experiment was unaffected as well. The risk ratios were 1.08 (95% CI: 0.91–1.29) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.85–1.07) for benign and malignant tumors, respectively. These observations are in agreement with other published findings. In the first experiment, however, the median latency for the development of the first malignant tumor in each animal was statistically significantly extended for RF-field-exposed animals compared to controls (278 days compared to 145 days, P = 0.009). No such differences were detected in the two subsequent experiments. These results show that low-level RF radiation does not appear to possess carcinogenic or cancer-promoting effects on DMBA-induced mammary tumors. To explain the mechanisms underlying the different results obtained in the three experiments, a hypothesis is presented which is based upon the neuroendocrine control mechanisms involved in the promotion of DMBA-induced mammary tumors. Despite the apparent absence of stimulatory effects of low-level RF-field exposure on the development and growth of solid tumors, it will be necessary to verify these results for leukemias and lymphomas, which may have completely different biological control mechanisms.