Comparative Analyses of Cyclosporine in Whole Blood and Plasma by Radioirmmunoassay, Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay, and High-Performance Liquid Chromatography
- 1 July 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
- Vol. 12 (4) , 344-352
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00007691-199007000-00008
Abstract
Cyclosporine (CsA) concentrations were prospectively monitored for 6 months after transplantation in 66 consecutive renal transplant recipients. Analysis for CsA was performed with polyclonal radioimmunoassay (RIA), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) in whole blood and plasma, and with specific and nonspecific monoclonal RIA in whole blood. Precision within and between runs was best with FPIA, followed by HPLC and RIA. A strong correlation was observed between the results obtained with HPLC and specific monoclonal RIA (r = 0.98). Correlation coefficients between the other assays ranged from 0.56 (plasma HPLC versus blood polyclonal RIA) to 0.91 (blood nonspecific monoclonal RIA versus blood FPIA). The highest values for CsA concentrations in blood were found with nonspecific monoclonal RIA, followed by FPIA and polyclonal RIA (mean ratio versus specific monoclonal RIA was 3.3, 2.9, and 2.4, respectively). Specific monoclonal RIA had 7% higher values than HPLC. There was a more than threefold interindividual variation in the mean ratio between specifically and nonspecifically measured CsA concentrations in whole blood and plasma. The ratio between CsA concentrations, determined with specific versus nonspecific methods in whole blood, decreased significantly during the first month after transplantation (from 0.42 to 0.35, as assayed with specific monoclonal RIA versus polyclonal RIA in whole blood; p < 0.05). The concentrations in blood were, on the average, three times higher than those in plasma, althouth there was a more than fourfold interindividual variation in the mean values. The large interindividual variations in ratios between the results obtained in different assays and in different media show that each procedure for monitoring of CsA in transplant patients has to be evaluated separately. Moreover, specific analytical methods should be used for monitoring CsA.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Potential of monoclonal antibodies to improve therapeutic monitoring of cyclosporine.Clinical Chemistry, 1987
- Blood cyclosporin concentrations and renal allograft dysfunction.BMJ, 1986
- Relationships of cyclosporine concentrations in serum, whole blood, and bile after renal and hepatic transplantation.Clinical Chemistry, 1986
- CYCLOSPORINE PLASMA LEVELS IN RENAL TRANSPLANT PATIENTSTransplantation, 1985
- Semi-automated high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of cyclosporine A in whole blood using one-step sample purification and column-switchingJournal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications, 1985
- Distribution and concentration of cyclosporin in human blood.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1984
- Liquid-chromatographic determination of cyclosporine in serum with use of a rapid extraction procedure.Clinical Chemistry, 1982
- Determination of cyclosporin A in blood and plasma by column switching‐HPLC after rapid sample preparationJournal of High Resolution Chromatography, 1982
- Liquid-chromatographic determination of cyclosporin A in blood and plasma.Clinical Chemistry, 1981
- IMMUNOLOGICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL MONITORING IN THE CLINICAL USE OF CYCLOSPORIN AThe Lancet, 1981