Resolving Indeterminacy in Dynamic Settings: The Role of Shocks*
- 1 February 2000
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Vol. 115 (1) , 285-304
- https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554746
Abstract
This paper shows that the phenomenon of multiple equilibria can be fragile to the introduction of aggregate shocks. We examine a standard dynamic model of sectoral choice with external increasing returns. Without shocks, the outcome is indeterminate: there are multiple rational expectations equilibria. We then introduce shocks in the form of a parameter that follows a Brownian motion and affects relative productivity in the two sectors. We assume that the parameter can reach values at which working in either sector becomes a dominant choice. A unique equilibrium emerges; for any path of the random parameter, there is a unique path that the economy must follow. There is no role for multiple, self-fulfilling prophecies or sunspots.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fast Equilibrium Selection by Rational Players Living in a Changing WorldEconometrica, 2001
- On the time and direction of stochastic bifurcationPublished by Elsevier ,1998
- Indeterminacy and sector-specific externalitiesJournal of Monetary Economics, 1996
- Indeterminacy and Increasing ReturnsJournal of Economic Theory, 1994
- External effects in U.S. procyclical productivityJournal of Monetary Economics, 1992
- Pairwise Credit in Search EquilibriumThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1990
- Rational Expectations Business Cycles in Search EquilibriumJournal of Political Economy, 1989
- Coordinating Coordination Failures in Keynesian ModelsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1988
- A Simple Rational Expectations Keynes-Type ModelThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1983
- Aggregate Demand Management in Search EquilibriumJournal of Political Economy, 1982