Paradox in the experiences of professional women
- 30 December 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Western Journal of Speech Communication
- Vol. 47 (4) , 305-322
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318309374128
Abstract
The recent surge of research on difficulties faced by professional women has not been complemented by the development of a synthetic framework which would facilitate conceptualization, analysis, and theory building. This article demonstrates the heuristic power of concepts of paradox, double‐bind and mystification as descriptive metaphors for understanding the experiences of professional women. These concepts are then used to analyze six empirically derived paradoxes faced by professional women and to critique alternative communication strategies by which women professionals may define and manage complex, potentially mystifying situations.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Blacks and Women Must Try HarderPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1982
- Self-derogating behavior in women—fixed or flexible: The effects of co-worker's sexOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1978
- Is There a Motive to Avoid Success in Women?Human Relations, 1978
- The Sex Structuring of Organizations: A Search for Possible CausesAcademy of Management Review, 1978
- SEX ROLE STEREOTYPING, ABILITY AND PERFORMANCE: PRIOR RESEARCH AND NEW DIRECTIONS1Personnel Psychology, 1978
- The Impact of Hierarchical Structures on the Work Behavior of Women and MenSocial Problems, 1976
- The psychological basis for sex role stereotypes: A note on Terborg and Ilgen's conclusionsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1975
- The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973
- Sex-role stereotypes and clinical judgments of mental health.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1970
- Comments on the Theory of OrganizationsAmerican Political Science Review, 1952