Low-Energy Biphasic Waveform Defibrillation: Evidence-Based Review Applied to Emergency Cardiovascular Care Guidelines
- 28 April 1998
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 97 (16) , 1654-1667
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.97.16.1654
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Truncated exponential versus damped sinusoidal waveform shocks for transthoracic defibrillationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- Electrical treatment of cardiac arrhythmias: Defibrillation and cardioversionAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1993
- Comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for defibrillation using a nonthoracotomy systemThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- A prospective randomized evaluation of biphasic versus monophasic waveform pulses on defibrillation efficacy in humansJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1989
- Comparison of monophasic with single and dual capacitor biphasic waveforms for nonthoracotomy canine internal defibrillationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1989
- Improved internal defibrillation efficacy with a biphasic waveformAmerican Heart Journal, 1989
- Ventricular defibrillation using biphasic waveforms: The importance of phasic durationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1989
- Improved low energy defibrillation efficacy in man with the use of a biphasic truncated exponential waveformAmerican Heart Journal, 1989
- Ventricular Defibrillation — A Comparative Trial Using 175-J and 320-J ShocksNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982