Disappointments and Legacies of Social Indicators
- 1 October 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Public Policy
- Vol. 9 (4) , 429-432
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x00008291
Abstract
The social indicators movement has been a disappointment to its originators. By the late 1970s, at least in the US, the great hopes for social indicators to become a major influence on public policy had been tempered. The outpouring of literature using the term ‘social indicators’ dwindled. Policy scientists turned their attention to other topics or found new labels for their interests. The Social Science Research Council closed its Social Indicators Research Center in Washington, DC and stopped publishing its newsletter. And in the US no annual social report seemed likely to be institutionalized. Many observers decided the social indicators movement was a failure.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- SINET — The social indicators network newsSocial Indicators Research, 1992
- Rethinking national social reportsSocial Indicators Research, 1979
- The potential of social indicators: Minimum conditions for impact at the national level as suggested by a study of the use of ?social indicators? 73Social Indicators Research, 1978