The Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Surgery
- Vol. 132 (1) , 41-44
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430250043009
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy is an emerging technology for patients with cancer, polyps, inflammation, and other types of pathologic conditions. While previous studies have shown better outcomes for laparoscopic cholecystectomies when surgeons perform more procedures, there is no information on the relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes for laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. Objective: To evaluate whether better clinical outcomes are found for surgeons who perform higher numbers of laparoscopic-assisted colectomies and whether such a relationship, if it exists, applies to both intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. Design: Analysis of a data set of 1194 patients, operated on by 114 surgeons, from a prospective registry sponsored by the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, from May 1991 to October 1994. Main Outcome Measures: Completion rate, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. Results: In 75% of cases, surgery was completed laparoscopically, with no difference between high-volume surgeons (≥40 cases) and low-volume surgeons. Length of stay (average, 6 days) did not vary according to surgeon volume. Postoperative complications occurred in 15% of cases, with a significantly lower rate for high-volume surgeons (10% vs 19%; P<.001). Intraoperative complications occurred in 5% of cases, with a nonsignificant trend toward a lower rate for high-volume surgeons (3.7% vs 6.3%). A multivariate regression analysis, adjusting for type of disease (cancer vs inflammation vs polyps) and for level of difficulty of the procedure (high vs low) showed that for high-volume surgeons there is a lower probability of both intraoperative complications (adjusted odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.97; P=.04) and postoperative complications (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.68; P<.001). Conclusions: There is a learning curve for laparoscopic-assisted colectomy with respect to intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. As with other laparoscopic procedures, surgeons who perform higher volumes of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy have lower rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications. Arch Surg. 1997;132:41-44Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic HerniorrhaphyPublished by Springer Nature ,2008
- The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomyThe American Journal of Surgery, 1995
- Role of laparoscopy in colorectal surgery A prospective evaluation of 200 casesDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1995
- Sequential Psychomotor Skills Development in Laparoscopic Colon SurgeryArchives of Surgery, 1994
- Does experience improve hospital performance in treating patients with AIDS?Health Policy, 1993
- Laparoscopic surgery for colon and rectal cancerSeminars in Surgical Oncology, 1993
- Laparoscopic Colon Resection: A Case ReportJournal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery, 1991
- A Prospective Analysis of 1518 Laparoscopic CholecystectomiesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Physician and Hospital Factors Associated With Mortality of Surgical PatientsMedical Care, 1986
- The Complications of Coronary ArteriographyCirculation, 1973