Signaling, Investment Opportunities, and Dividend Announcements
- 1 October 1995
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 8 (4) , 995-1018
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/8.4.995
Abstract
This article examines potential explanations for the wealth effects surrounding dividend change announcements. We find that new information concerning managers' investment policies is not revealed at the time of the dividend announcement. We also find that dividend increases (decreases) are associated with subsequent significant increases (decreases) in capital expenditures over the three years following the dividend change, and that dividend change announcements are associated with revisions in analysts' forecasts of current earnings. These results are consistent with the cash flow signaling hypothesis rather than the free cash flow hypothesis as an explanation for the observed stock price reactions to dividend change announcements.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- A reexamination of analysts' earnings forecasts for takeover targetsJournal of Financial Economics, 1993
- Dividends and LossesThe Journal of Finance, 1992
- Common Stock Offerings and Earnings Expectations: A Test of the Release of Unfavorable InformationThe Journal of Finance, 1992
- Dividend clienteles and the information content of dividend changesJournal of Financial Economics, 1990
- FIRM SIZE AND DIVIDEND ANNOUNCEMENTSJournal of Financial Research, 1988
- Earnings information conveyed by dividend initiations and omissionsJournal of Financial Economics, 1988
- EVIDENCE OF A RELATION BETWEEN STOCK PRICE REACTIONS AROUND CASH DIVIDEND CHANGES AND YIELDSJournal of Financial Research, 1988
- The Impact of Initiating Dividend Payments on Shareholders' WealthThe Journal of Business, 1983
- Quarterly Dividend and Earnings Announcements and Stockholders' Returns: An Empirical AnalysisThe Journal of Finance, 1980
- Imperfect Information, Dividend Policy, and "The Bird in the Hand" FallacyThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1979