A Cognitive Scientist Looks at Daubert
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 95 (S1) , S114-S120
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2004.044552
Abstract
Our system of justice requires that trials be maximally fair. It is part of what holds this society together. Indeed, it is part of the genius of the justice system to have a kind of balance between strict and nurturant morality within the judicial system, so that the system itself provides a kind of moral and political balance. Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc (1993) has upset that balance and has made our judicial system significantly less fair and more politically conservative. Daubert is not just about the application of some procedural rule (Rule 702). Daubert functions in its application as a strategic initiative that significantly moves America in a conservative direction, in the moral and political spheres, as well as in the legal sphere.Keywords
This publication has 1 reference indexed in Scilit:
- The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about languagePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1993