The Effects of Massed versus Spaced Formats in Teaching Sound-Symbol Correspondences to Young Children
Open Access
- 1 September 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Reading Behavior
- Vol. 12 (3) , 225-229
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10862968009547373
Abstract
Twenty-eight first graders were taught letter-sound correspondences according to massed and spaced formats. One group received a spaced format on i and massed format on e, and the other received a spaced format on e, and massed format on J. A paired associated format required children to produce the appropriate sounds in response to visually presented letters ( e, m, s, c, i). Compared to the massed format, correct responses to the letter presented according to the spaced format were more frequent on the posttest (72% versus 38%), though less frequent during training (56% versus 74%). The findings extended the superiority of spaced presentations to younger subjects and academically relevant stimuli.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Two Letter Discrimination Sequences: High-Confusion-Alternatives First versus Low-Confusion-Alternatives FirstJournal of Reading Behavior, 1980
- Similar Sound Separation and Cumulative Introduction in Learning Letter-Sound CorrespondencesThe Journal of Educational Research, 1976
- The spacing effect in the learning of word pairsMemory & Cognition, 1974
- Effects of Massed and Spaced Practice on Learning in Brain-damaged, Behavior-disordered, and Normal ChildrenJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1971
- The situation with respect to the spacing of repetitions and memoryJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1970
- Collecting a data base for a reading technology.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1970
- Paired-associate learning with massed and distributed repetitions of items.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964