Hemoglobins and hematocrits: are they equally sensitive in detecting anemias?
Open Access
- 1 January 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Vol. 34 (1) , 61-64
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/34.1.61
Abstract
General medical and nutritional practice assumes that hemoglobin and hematocrit values are equally useful in detecting anemia and that they can be used interchangeably for anemia screening. These two tests, at presumed equivalent levels, identify varying prevalences of anemia in the same population. This study examines anemia prevalence rates using hemoglobin and hematocrit tests performed in seven separate surveys on a total of 13,040 children. These data indicate that hemoglobin and hematocrit screening tests are indeed not comparable in detecting anemia in the same population. Using only hematocrit tests, anemia is diagnosed in 1 to 10% of children with normal hemoglobin levels and is not detected in 20 to 50% of children who might be considered anemic on the basis of low hemoglobin levels.This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Study of Nutritional Status of Preschool Children in the United States, 1968-1970Pediatrics, 1974
- Re‐assessment of the Reliability of the HaematocritBritish Journal of Haematology, 1972
- Hemoglobin and hematocrit values in iron deficiency in infancyThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1972