Compensation for Industrial Injury and Disease
- 20 January 1975
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Social Policy
- Vol. 4 (1) , 25-55
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279400003986
Abstract
The article contains the authors' evidence to the Royal Commission on Civil Liability. It discusses the main sources of compensation for industrial injury: the State's industrial injuries scheme, occupational sick pay and common law damages. Under each head the role of trade unions is assessed. State benefits provide compensation for injury, disablement and death, but impose a narrow definition of accident and disease. The adequacy of the level of benefits is also questioned. The common law system, moreover, is criticized on several fundamental grounds including cost, uncertainty, delay, legalism and the adverse effect on industrial safety. The authors propose the abolition of common law damages, provided the resources involved are used within a reformed State scheme. State benefit payable during absence from work is envisaged at 90 per cent of average post-tax earnings, with the employer legally obliged to pay no less than the equivalent amount for the initial period of absence. There would also be payments for loss of earnings after a man returns to employment, for non-pecuniary losses and to compensate the widows of those killed in industrial accidents.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- TRADE UNION LEGAL SERVICESBritish Journal of Industrial Relations, 1974
- Hypopituitarism Secondary to Hypothalamic InsufficiencyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1973
- The Robens ReportIndustrial Law Journal, 1972
- SOME SOCIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF STRICT LIABILITY AND THE ENFORCEMENT OF FACTORY LEGISLATIONThe Modern Law Review, 1970