Problems With Individual Difference Measures Based on Some Componential Cognitive Paradigms
- 1 March 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Applied Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 13 (1) , 9-17
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168901300102
Abstract
This article demonstrates that slope and ratio scores may have the same psychometric difficulties—low re liability—as difference scores. Empirically, direct measures and derived scores from Baron's, Collins', Meyer's, and Posner's cognitive paradigms were ex amined in terms of their reliabilities and cross-correla tions. Reliabilities of the direct measures and their in tercorrelations were high. The derived measures, which were slope, ratio, and difference scores, had re liabilities near zero and, therefore, their cross-correla tions were also low. It is concluded that derived scores, although intuitively appealing as measures of mental operations, may have inherent psychometric difficulties that render them of little value for differen tial prediction. Index terms: cognitive paradigms, difference scores, individual differences, prediction, ratio scores, reliability, slope scores.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the Nature of IntelligenceScience, 1983
- The Stroop as a Performance Evaluation Test for Environmental ResearchThe Journal of Psychology, 1982
- Mechanics of verbal ability.Psychological Review, 1978
- Individual differences in speed of phonemic analysis, visual analysis, and readingActa Psychologica, 1975
- Phonemic Stage Not Necessary for ReadingQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973
- How we should measure "change": Or should we?Psychological Bulletin, 1970
- Retrieval time from semantic memoryJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969
- On the speed of mental processesActa Psychologica, 1969
- Scoring the Stroop testActa Psychologica, 1965
- Some Tests of the Decay Theory of Immediate MemoryQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1958