Cellular defense reactions in five barley cultivars against Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici were examined in the course of primary and secondary penetrations. In cv. Kairyobozu-mugi, 35% of infection attempts were stopped at fluorescent papillae, and the others (65%) induced fluorescing of epidermal cells, resulting in the failure of the formation of primary haustoria. In the other cultivars ('H.E.S.4', 'Russian No. 12', 'Goseshikoku', and 'Turkey 290') the penetration failures associated with fluorescent papillae reached 50–75%, but the infection attempts that induced the fluorescing of epidermal cells were fewer than 20%. Consequently 10–30% of the germlings that attempted penetration successfully formed normal primary haustoria 48 h after inoculation. In cv. Goseshikoku, cv. Russian No. 12, and cv. H.E.S.4, 50–75% of the epidermal cells that contained the primary haustoria were fluorescent 7 days after inoculation, and colony growth was severely restricted. In cv. Turkey 290 such fluorescent cells scarcely occurred and colonies developed comparatively well. On this cultivar conidia were produced 5–6 days after inoculation, but only in small quantities. This restriction of colony development was mainly attributable to the inhibition of the formation of secondary haustoria by fluorescent papillae. These results indicate that there are differences among barley cultivars in cellular defense reactions against the wheat powdery mildew fungus and suggest that the formation of papillae during the course of primary penetration is not necessarily an essential factor in the resistance of barley to this inappropriate forma specialis.