On the separability of two mechanisms involved in the detection of grating patterns in humans.
- 1 June 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Physiology
- Vol. 291 (1) , 251-263
- https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012810
Abstract
1. The detectability of contrast modulation (M) of sinusoidal gratings was explored at the rate of 8 Hz. The luminance profile of a contrast modulated sinusoidal grating is L = L(1 + C cos 2 pi F chi). This stimulus may also be regarded as the sum of a steady grating pattern and counter phase flicker of the same spatial frequency. 2. Contrast modulation sensitivity (1/M) was established in five observers at several levels of constract and over a range of spatial frequencies, where M = delta C/C of delta C is the just detectable contrast change and C is the mean contrast of the grating. The slope of a modulation sensitivity function (C/delta C vs. C) is 1 (i.e. delta C = constant) near threshold contrast at each spatial frequency, but in the suprathreshold contrast range the slope flattens from close to 1 at 1.5 c/deg to almost 0 (delta C/C = constant) at 12 c/deg. 3. Adaptation to a high contrast steady grating of the same spatial frequency as the contrast modulated test gratings shifts each modulation sensitivity function to the right at low contrasts, but not at high. As a result the adapted curves cross their corresponding unadapted ones. At each spatial frequency the modulation sensitivity function is now fitted by a straight line of slope 1. While delta C needs to be higher than half the detection threshold of the same grating at spatial frequencies above 3 c/deg, in the adapted condition the values are nearly equal at each frequency. Thus pattern adaptation unmasks the threshold of the counterphase component of the contrast modulated grating near threshold contrast as well as above it. The phase of the steady adapting grating, relative to the steady component of the test grating, does not make any difference. 4. Apparently contrast modulation reveals differences beyond threshold sensitivity between spatial frequencies adjacent to the peak of the contrast sensitivity curve. For each spatial frequency channel there must be different neural coupling between steady and modulated inputs. Electrophysiological studies using contrast modulated gratings would be useful in the exploration of individual and ensemble properties of neurones of the visual cortex.This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Foveal striate cortex of behaving monkey: single-neuron responses to square-wave gratings during fixation of gazeJournal of Neurophysiology, 1977
- Temporal studies with flashed gratings: Inferences about human transient and sustained channelsVision Research, 1977
- Spatial frequency rows in the striate visual cortexVision Research, 1977
- Patterns of temporal interaction in the detection of gratingsVision Research, 1977
- Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. III. Spatial frequencyJournal of Neurophysiology, 1976
- Psychophysical evidence for sustained and transient detectors in human visionThe Journal of Physiology, 1973
- On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal imagesThe Journal of Physiology, 1969
- Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratingsThe Journal of Physiology, 1968
- Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortexThe Journal of Physiology, 1968
- Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.The Journal of Physiology, 1965