Comparison of Efficiencies of Three Techniques for Colon Surgery
- 1 February 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
- Vol. 10 (1) , 47-53
- https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2000.10.47
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the most efficient technique for performing a colectomy, we used the methodology of time-motion analysis. Methods: The efficiency of five hand-assisted and six regular laparoscopic colectomies and one open colectomy, performed by four surgeons in three different hospitals, was measured. The open colectomy was analyzed as a reference procedure. Results and Conclusions: The hand-assisted laparoscopic technique was the most efficient. Hand-assisted laparoscopy was therefore less time consuming than laparoscopic surgery. Open surgery was the fastest technique, because the time for every surgical motion is a factor of three shorter than for the two laparoscopic techniques.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-term postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the elderly: ISPOCD1 studyPublished by Elsevier ,1998
- Laparoscopic surgeryThe Lancet, 1997
- Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy with the dexterityTM pneumo sleeveDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1996
- Technique of Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic SurgeryJournal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery, 1996
- The metabolic response to laparoscopic and open nephrectomyMinimally Invasive Therapy, 1994
- Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in an unselected group of patientsThe Lancet, 1992
- Laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomyDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1991