Safety-Engineered Device Implementation: Does It Introduce Bias in Percutaneous Injury Reporting?
- 1 July 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Vol. 25 (7) , 543-547
- https://doi.org/10.1086/502437
Abstract
Safety-Engineered Device Implementation: Does It Introduce Bias in Percutaneous Injury Reporting? - Volume 25 Issue 7 - SeJean Sohn, Janet Eagan, Kent A. SepkowitzKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of Implementing Safety-Engineered Devices on Percutaneous Injury EpidemiologyInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2004
- Percutaneous Injury, Blood Exposure, and Adherence to Standard Precautions: Are Hospital-Based Health Care Providers Still at Risk?Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2003
- Report of the Council on Scientific AffairsArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2001
- Occupational Exposure to Blood: Search for a Relation Between Personality and BehaviorInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2000
- The Impact of Multifocused Interventions on Sharps Injury Rates at an Acute-Care HospitalInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1999
- A survey of percutaneous/mucocutaneous injury reporting in a public teaching hospitalJournal of Hospital Infection, 1999
- Do protective devices prevent needlestick injuries among health care workers?*1American Journal of Infection Control, 1995
- Impact of a needleless intravenous system in a university hospitalAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 1992
- Sharp object injuries in the hospital: Causes and strategies for preventionAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 1990
- Underreporting of needlestick injuries in a university hospitalAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 1983