Comparisons of frequency selectivity in simultaneous and forward masking for subjects with unilateral cochlear impairments
- 1 July 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 80 (1) , 93-107
- https://doi.org/10.1121/1.394087
Abstract
Two experiments are described in which frequency selectivity was estimated, in simultaneous and forward masking, for each ear of subjects with moderate (25–60 dB HL) unilateral cochlear hearing losses. In both experiments, the signal level was fixed for a given ear and type of masking (simultaneous or forward), and the masker level was varied to determine threshold, using an adaptive, two-alternative forced-choice procedure. In experiment I, the masker was a noise with a spectral notch centered at the signal frequency (either 1.0 or 1.5 kHz); threshold was determined as a function of notch width. Signal levels were chosen so that the noise level required at threshold for a notch width of zero was similar for the normal and impaired ear of each subject in both simultaneous and forward masking. The function relating threshold to notch width had a steeper slope for the normal ear than for the impaired ear of each subject. For the normal ears, these functions were steeper in forward masking than in simultaneous masking. This difference was interpreted as resulting from suppression. For the impaired ears, significant differences in the same direction were observed for three of the five subjects, but the differences were smaller. In experiment II, psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) were determined in the presence of a fixed notched noise centered at the signal frequency (1.0 kHz). For the normal ears, the PTCs were sharper in forward masking than in simultaneous masking. For the impaired ears, the PTCs were similar in simultaneous and forward masking, but those in forward masking tended to be sharper at masker frequencies far removed from the signal frequency. Overall, the results suggest that suppression is reduced, but not completely absent in cases of moderate cochlear hearing loss.This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Two-Tone Forward Masking Patterns and TinnitusJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1980
- Frequency Selectivity in Normally-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired ObserversJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1980
- Mechanism and frequency distribution of two-tone suppression in forward maskingThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1980
- Effects of hair cell lesions on responses of cochlear nerve fibers. II. Single- and two-tone intensity functions in relation to tuning curves.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1980
- Effects of hair cell lesions on responses of cochlear nerve fibers. I. Lesions, tuning curves, two-tone inhibition, and responses to trapezoidal-wave patterns.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1980
- Suppression and critical bands in band-limiting experimentsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978
- Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward maskingThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978
- ’’Suppression’’ effects in forward maskingThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977
- Two-tone unmasking and suppression in a forward-masking situationThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1976
- Compound action potential (AP) tuning curvesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1976