In Defence of Critical Realism
- 1 July 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Capital & Class
- Vol. 22 (2) , 73-106
- https://doi.org/10.1177/030981689806500107
Abstract
This article reassesses critical realism's role as an underlabourer to the sciences and whether it is of any use to a Marxist analysis. It deals with some of the issues raised in the debate between regulation theorists and open Marxists whilst arguing that this debate does not do full credit to the scope of critical realism. Whilst a rejection of the regulation approach is necessary, it is also necessary to analyse forms of regulation and hegemonic strategies based on the fact that the social world is complexly stratified. However, this stratification also points to the dominant contradictions within capitalism and the centrality of struggle in shaping the social world.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Realist Social TheoryPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1995
- Against Critical RealismCapital & Class, 1994
- Economics and Epistemology: A Realist CritiqueCapital & Class, 1992
- Post-Fordism and Social FormPublished by Springer Nature ,1991
- Neither fundamentalism nor ‘new realism’: a critical realist perspective on current divisions in socialist theoryCapital & Class, 1990
- Regulation theories in retrospect and prospectEconomy and Society, 1990
- The Political Economy of Postwar ReconstructionPublished by Springer Nature ,1990
- Marxism and philosophy: a critique of critical realismCapital & Class, 1989
- The Great Bear, post-Fordism and class struggle: A comment on Bonefeld and JessopCapital & Class, 1988
- Reformulation of state theoryCapital & Class, 1987