Requirements for intercistronic distance and level of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 activity in reinitiation on GCN4 mRNA vary with the downstream cistron.
- 1 April 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Vol. 14 (4) , 2616-2628
- https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.14.4.2616
Abstract
Translational control of the GCN4 gene in response to amino acid availability is mediated by four short open reading frames in the GCN4 mRNA leader (uORFs) and by phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF-2). We have proposed that reducing eIF-2 activity by phosphorylation of its alpha subunit or by a mutation in the eIF-2 recycling factor eIF-2B allows ribosomes which have translated the 5'-proximal uORF1 to bypass uORF2 to uORF4 and reinitiate at GCN4 instead. In this report, we present two lines of evidence that all ribosomes which synthesize GCN4 have previously translated uORF1, resumed scanning, and reinitiated at the GCN4 start site. First, GCN4 expression was abolished when uORF1 was elongated to make it overlap the beginning of the GCN4 coding region. Second, GCN4 expression was reduced as uORF1 was moved progressively closer to GCN4, decreasing to only 5% of the level seen in the absence of all uORFs when only 32 nucleotides separated uORF1 from GCN4. We additionally found that inserting small synthetic uORFs between uORF4 and GCN4 inhibited GCN4 expression under derepressing conditions, confirming the idea that reinitiation at GCN4 under conditions of diminished eIF-2 activity is proportional to the distance of the reinitiation site downstream from uORF1. While uORF4 and GCN4 appear to be equally effective at capturing ribosomes scanning downstream from the 5' cap of mRNA, these two ORFs differ greatly in their ability to capture reinitiating ribosomes scanning from uORF1. When the active form of eIF-2 is present at high levels, reinitiation appears to be much more efficient at uORF4 than at GCN4 when each is located very close to uORF1. Under conditions of reduced recycling of eIF-2, reinitiation at uORF4 is substantially suppressed, which allows ribosomes to reach the GCN4 start site; in contrast, reinitiation at GCN4 in constructs lacking uORF4 is unaffected by decreasing the level of eIF-2 activity. This last finding raises the possibility that time-dependent binding to ribosomes of a second factor besides the eIF-2-GTP-Met-tRNA(iMet) ternary complex is rate limiting for reinitiation at GCN4. Moreover, our results show that the efficiency of translational reinitiation can be strongly influenced by the nature of the downstream cistron as well as the intercistronic distance.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of sequence context at stop codons on efficiency of reinitiation in GCN4 translational control.Molecular and Cellular Biology, 1994
- Influences of mRNA secondary structure on initiation by eukaryotic ribosomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1986
- Multiple upstream AUG codons mediate translational control of GCN4Cell, 1986
- Point mutations define a sequence flanking the AUG initiator codon that modulates translation by eukaryotic ribosomesCell, 1986
- Affecting gene expression by altering the length and sequence of the 5' leader.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1984
- Evidence for translational regulation of the activator of general amino acid control in yeast.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1984
- Initiation of translation at internal AUG codons in mammalian cellsNature, 1984
- Selection of initiation sites by eucaryotic ribosomes: effect of inserting AUG triplets upstream from the coding sequence for preproinsulinNucleic Acids Research, 1984
- Effect of phosphorylation of the alpha-subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 on the function of reversing factor in the initiation of protein synthesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1983
- Mechanism of polypeptide chain initiation in eukaryotes and its control by phosphorylation of the alpha subunit of initiation factor 2.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1982