Clinical Reactions and Immunogenicity of the BIKEN Acellular Diphtheria and Tetanus Toxoids and Pertussis Vaccine in 4- Through 6-Year-Old US Children
- 1 May 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
- Vol. 146 (5) , 556-9
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1992.02160170036012
Abstract
• Objective. —To compare the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a two-component acellular pertussis vaccine with a whole-cell diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine (W-DTP) when administered as a booster to children 4 through 6 years of age. Design. —This was a randomized, double-blind study. Setting. —Children in this study were from three general pediatric practices (two were private, one was university-affiliated). Participants. —Three hundred and sixteen 4- through 6-year-old children who had received four previous W-DTP immunizations at the recommended times were studied. Selection Procedures and Interventions. —Children were randomly assigned in a 1:3 ratio to receive either W-DTP or one of three lots of acellular diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine (A-DTP). The A-DTPs contained 3.75 μg each of lymphocytosis promoting factor and filamentous hemagglutinin protein nitrogen per 0.5 mL and the same concentrations of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids as W-DTP. Serum samples were obtained on the day of immunization and 4 to 6 weeks later. Adverse reactions were recorded by parents at 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours. Measurements and Results. —An indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method determined IgG antibody response to lymphocytosis promoting factor, filamentous hemagglutinin, and tetanus toxoid; a CHO cell assay measured neutralizing antibodies to pertussis toxin; and serum neutralization on VERO cells assayed diphtheria antitoxin. One month after booster doses were administered, the geometric mean antibody levels for A-DTP vs W-DTP were IgG filamentous hemagglutinin, 408 vs 81 ELISA U/mL; IgG lymphocytosis promoting factor, 362 vs 104 ELISA U/mL; CHO cell, 210 vs 107; diphtheria, 21.7 vs 12.1 U/mL;, and tetanus, 2.86 vs 2.04 Eq/mL. Following immunization with A-DTP, local and systemic adverse experiences were 30% to 50% and 20% to 30% fewer, respectively, as compared with W-DTP. Conclusions. —The BIKEN A-DTP vaccine used in this study demonstrates enhanced immunogenicity to lymphocytosis promoting factor, filamentous hemagglutinin, and other measured antigens and less reactogenicity compared with licensed W-DTP. (AJDC. 1992;146:556-559)Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Current epidemiology of pertussis in JapanThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 1990
- A Pertussis Vaccine Myth DiesArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1990
- Pertussis vaccine and injury to the brainThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1990
- Pertussis VaccinesPediatric Clinics of North America, 1990
- Efficacy and Immunogenicity of Acellular Pertussis Vaccine by Manufacturer and Patient AgeArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1989
- Efficacy and safety of acellular pertussis vaccine in Aichi Prefecture, JapanThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 1988
- Type-Specific Efficacy of Acellular Pertussis VaccineArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1988
- Adverse reactions and antibody responses to acellular pertussis vaccineThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1986
- DTP Vaccine LitigationArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1986
- The standardization of an assay for pertussis toxin and antitoxin in microplate culture of Chinese hamster ovary cellsJournal of Biological Standardization, 1985