Infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biologic agents
Top Cited Papers
- 27 October 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Vol. 52 (11) , 3403-3412
- https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21386
Abstract
Objective: To estimate the incidence rates of serious and nonserious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who start treatment with a biologic agent, and to compare these rates with those in patients with RA who receive conventional treatment.Methods: Patients enrolled in the German biologics register between May 2001 and September 2003 were included. Treating rheumatologists assessed adverse events and serious adverse events. All adverse events and serious adverse events experienced within 12 months after study entry were analyzed. Propensity score methods were applied to estimate which part of a rate increase was likely to be attributable to differences in patient characteristics.Results: Data were available for 512 patients receiving etanercept, 346 patients receiving infliximab, 70 patients receiving anakinra, and 601 control patients treated with disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs. The total number of adverse events per 100 patient‐years was 22.6 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 18.7–27.2) among patients receiving etanercept, 28.3 (95% CI 23.1–34.7) among patients receiving infliximab, and 6.8 (95% CI 5.0–9.4) among controls (P< 0.0001). Significant differences in the rate of serious adverse events were also observed. For patients receiving etanercept, those receiving infliximab, and controls, the total numbers of serious adverse events per 100 patient‐years were 6.4 (95% CI 4.5–9.1), 6.2 (95% CI 4.0–9.5), and 2.3 (95% CI 1.3–3.9), respectively (P= 0.0016). After adjusting for differences in the case patient mix, the relative risks of serious adverse events were 2.2 (95% CI 0.9–5.4) for patients receiving etanercept and 2.1 (95% CI 0.8–5.5) for patients receiving infliximab, compared with controls.Conclusion: Patients treated with biologic agents have a higher a priori risk of infection. However, our data suggest that this risk is increased by treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Updated consensus statement on biological agents, specifically tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) blocking agents and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), for the treatment of rheumatic diseases, 2004Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2004
- Sustained improvement over two years in physical function, structural damage, and signs and symptoms among patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with infliximab and methotrexateArthritis & Rheumatism, 2004
- Safety of Tumour Necrosis Factor-?? AntagonistsDrug Safety, 2004
- Skin infections and ageingAgeing Research Reviews, 2003
- Etanercept versus methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: Two‐year radiographic and clinical outcomesArthritis & Rheumatism, 2002
- Experience with etanercept in an academic medical center: Are infection rates increased?Arthritis & Rheumatism, 2002
- Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1995
- The mortality of rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1994
- The american rheumatism association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1988