Body Weight, Short-Term Satiation and the Response to Reward Magnitude Shifts
Open Access
- 1 February 1975
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 27 (1) , 73-91
- https://doi.org/10.1080/14640747508400465
Abstract
It was confirmed that highly reliable “over-shooting“ (O-SH) and “undershooting” (U-SH) can be obtained when a stimulus associated with a contrasting magnitude of reward intrudes briefly into a session in which the animal receives either a high or low magnitude of reward as a baseline condition (Baltzer and Weiskrantz, 1970). These effects may be related to Crespi “elation” and “depression” effects, but it is also possible that they are dependent on differences in the amount of food ingested on the two baseline conditions. The effects of variations in body weight and pre-feeding in the rat were examined. The optimal level for obtaining the effects lies around the 95% body weight level. With body weight held constant, alterations in short-term satiation induced by pre-feeding before all sessions did not significantly change the magnitude of intrusion effects except in one extreme instance that might be accounted for by a basement effect. Differences in satiation level between the two baseline conditions can affect powerfully the magnitude of O-SH and U-SH, but nevertheless when such differences are eliminated reliable effects are still found. Arguments are advanced as to how short-term satiation and long-term deprivation factors might account for the magnitude of O-SH and U-SH, and reasons offered for considering that O-SH and U-SH have an emotional basis.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Refeeding after differential severity of deprivationPhysiology & Behavior, 1972
- Negative and Positive Behavioural Contrast in the Same AnimalsNature, 1970
- Non-Interaction of Ventromedial and Lateral Hypothalamic Mechanisms in the Regulation of Feeding and Hoarding Behaviour in the RatQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970
- Positive Contrast in the Runway Obtained with Delay of RewardScience, 1969
- Sodium amobarbital and effects of frustrative nonreward.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1969
- Contrasted conditions of reinforcement: A selective critique.Psychological Bulletin, 1968
- Response strength as a function of drive level and pre- and postshift incentive magnitude.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962
- BEHAVIORAL CONTRASTJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1961
- Amount of reinforcement and level of performance.Psychological Review, 1944
- Quantitative Variation of Incentive and Performance in the White RatThe American Journal of Psychology, 1942