Canonical transformations to action and phase-angle variables and phase operators
- 1 July 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review A
- Vol. 48 (1) , 752-757
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.48.752
Abstract
The well-known difficulties of defining a phase operator of an oscillator are considered from the point of view of the canonical transformation to action and phase-angle variables. This transformation turns out to be nonbijective, i.e., it is not a one-to-one onto mapping. In order to make possible the unitarity of its representations in quantum optics we should enlarge the Hilbert space of the problem. In this enlarged space we find a phase operator that, after projection, reproduces previous candidates to represent a well-behaved phase operator in the quantum domain.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Alternative derivation of the Pegg-Barnett phase operatorPhysical Review A, 1993
- Phase properties of real field states: The Garrison-Wong versus Pegg-Barnett predictionsPhysical Review A, 1992
- Nonclassical states of light and canonical transformationsJournal of Physics A: General Physics, 1991
- The broadening of the phase distribution due to linear amplificationOptics Communications, 1991
- Hermitian phase-difference operator analysis of microscopic radiation-field measurementsPhysical Review A, 1990
- Fluctuation of the Barnett-Pegg phase operator in a coherent statePhysical Review A, 1990
- On the Hermitian Optical Phase OperatorJournal of Modern Optics, 1989
- Partial isometries and quotient structures in Hilbert spacesReports on Mathematical Physics, 1980
- Canonical Operators for the Simple Harmonic OscillatorJournal of Mathematical Physics, 1969
- Dynamics of Electrons in Solids in External FieldsPhysical Review B, 1968