How Contrastive Explanation Facilitates Theory Building
- 1 April 2011
- journal article
- Published by Academy of Management in Academy of Management Review
- Vol. 36 (2) , 404-419
- https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0153
Abstract
We introduce the theory of contrastive explanation, the core argument of which is that we do not explain an entire phenomenon but only aspects of it. Using the example of transaction cost economics, we illustrate how contrastive explanation can assist organizational researchers in creating, broadening, and deepening their theories through posing suitable contrastive questions. We summarize our discussion into eight heuristic rules that will serve as useful theory-building tools.Keywords
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- False Models as Explanatory EnginesPhilosophy of the Social Sciences, 2008
- Explanatory Pluralism and ComplementarityPhilosophy of the Social Sciences, 2008
- Stylized facts, empirical research and theory development in managementStrategic Organization, 2007
- REASONS, CAUSES, AND CONTRASTSPacific Philosophical Quarterly, 2007
- Fisher Body revisited: Supply contracts and vertical integrationEuropean Journal of Law and Economics, 2006
- Mechanism and ExplanationPhilosophy of the Social Sciences, 1997
- What Theory is NotAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1995
- Why P rather than Q? The curiosities of fact and foilPhilosophical Studies, 1994
- Concept Fallibility in Organizational ScienceAcademy of Management Review, 1989
- The Population Ecology of OrganizationsAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1977