A comparison of three types of earmoulds in elderly users of post-aural hearing aids
- 1 January 1989
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in British Journal of Audiology
- Vol. 23 (3) , 239-244
- https://doi.org/10.3109/03005368909076505
Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess the ease of handling, comfort, and general effectiveness of three types of earmould in patients who, due to their age, could be expected to experience handling difficulties. The three mould types were, meatal tip, skeleton and skeleton with the ‘top prong’ removed. The results indicated that the skeleton with the top prong removed was the best in all contexts but one. It was easiest and quickest to fit and least likely to be badly fitted. Only in feedback control did it perform less well. It was concluded that it should be routinely used for elderly patients fitted with low gain hearing aids.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recommended procedure for taking an aural impression British Society of AudiologyBritish Journal of Audiology, 1986
- Factors relating to the under-use of postaural hearing aidsBritish Journal of Audiology, 1985
- Problems with Handling the Be10 Series Hearing Aids Among Elderly PeopleBritish Journal of Audiology, 1979
- Hearing aid use by adults: a survey of surveysClinical Otolaryngology, 1977
- An Earmold for the Geriatric PatientJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1977
- Practical Aspects of Earmoulds for Post Aural Hearing AidsBritish Journal of Audiology, 1975
- Social Hearing Handicap IndexInternational Journal of Audiology, 1973