C2 monitoring in maintenance renal transplant recipients: is it worthwhile?
- 27 October 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Transplantation
- Vol. 76 (8) , 1236-1238
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000085046.39523.d5
Abstract
Presently, there is little knowledge regarding cyclosporine (CsA) concentration at 2 hr post-dose (C2) monitoring in maintenance patients. This study evaluates the actual C2 range in stable renal transplant recipients (who underwent transplantation >12 months ago). In addition, we investigated whether underexposure or overexposure to CsA (assessed by C2) affects graft function (as measured by serum [S]-creatinine). All renal transplant recipients in Norway receiving CsA were asked to participate; 1,447 fulfilled the criteria. Valid C2 and CsA trough concentration (C0) measurements were performed in 1,032 renal transplant recipients (71%) monitored by C0. Target C0 level was 75 to 125 μmol/L. CsA levels were measured using a Cloned Enzyme Donor Immunoassay method, and all analyses were performed in the same laboratory (overall mean [±standard deviation] CsA C0=112±31 μg/L, CsA C2=697±211 μg/L [range 81–1,580 μg/L], CsA dose [mg/day]=208±61, CsA dose [mg/kg/day]=2.8±1.1, and S-creatinine=141±58 μmol/L). A univariate analysis of variance showed that patients with C2 levels between 700 and 800 μg/L (n=203, S-creatinine=136±49 μmol/L) had significantly lower S-creatinine levels compared with patients with C2 levels greater than 950 μg/L (n=94, S-creatinine=152±56 μmol/L) (P 2 levels less than 450 μg/L (n=95, S-creatinine 141±72 μmol/L) (P 2 levels greater than 950 μg/L. There was no significant difference in S-creatinine between patients in the low and intermediate C2 group; 666 patients had C0 levels in the therapeutic range (75–125 μmol/L). A linear regression showed a significant relation between S-creatinine and C2 for these patients (P =0.03). The corresponding relation between S-creatinine and C0 was nonsignificant (P =0.3). Monitoring of C2 in maintenance patients is a valuable tool to detect overexposure to CsA. Until results from prospective studies are available, we recommend C0 in the therapeutic range and reduction in CsA in overexposed patients, aiming at a C2 value between 700 and 800 μg/L.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adequate Early Cyclosporin Exposure is Critical to Prevent Renal Allograft Rejection: Patients Monitored by Absorption ProfilingAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2002
- Recommendations for the Implementation of Neoral C2 Monitoring in Clinical PracticeTransplantation, 2002
- Therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressant drugs in clinical practiceClinical Therapeutics, 2002
- C2 single-point sampling to evaluate cyclosporine exposure in long-term renal transplant recipientsTransplantation Proceedings, 2001
- ABSORPTION PROFILING OF CYCLOSPORINE MICROEMULSION (NEORAL) DURING THE FIRST 2 WEEKS AFTER RENAL TRANSPLANTATION1Transplantation, 2001
- Approaching the Therapeutic Window for Cyclosporine in Kidney TransplantationJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2001
- C2 Monitoring Strategy for Optimising Cyclosporin Immunosuppression from the Neoral??* FormulationBioDrugs, 2001
- NEORAL MONITORING BY SIMPLIFIED SPARSE SAMPLING AREA UNDER THE CONCENTRATION-TIME CURVETransplantation, 1999