A multicentre randomised phase II study of carboplatin in combination with gemcitabine at standard rate or fixed dose rate infusion in patients with advanced stage non-small-cell lung cancer
- 2 May 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Oncology
- Vol. 17 (7) , 1128-1133
- https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdl084
Abstract
Background: Intracellular gemcitabine triphosphate (dFdCTP) levels can be optimised by administering gemcitabine at a fixed dose rate infusion. Patients and methods: Patients with chemonaive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomised to receive gemcitabine at a fixed dose rate gemcitabine 750 mg/m2 over 75 min (arm A) or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 over 30 min (arm B) on days 1 and 8 every three week cycle. Carboplatin at AUC of 5 was administered in both treatment arms on day 1 of each cycle. End points were activity, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of plasma and intracellular gemcitabine. Results: 76 patients were randomised. Response rate was 34% in arm A and 42% in arm B. Toxicity and quality of life scores were similar for both treatment arms. Mean plasma Cmaxgemcitabine and mean dFdCTP AUC in arm A was 20.8 μM ± 17.2 μM and 35 079 ± 18 216 μM*min respectively and in arm B, 41.2 ± 13.9 μM and 32 249 ± 11 267 μM*min respectively. dFdCTP saturation was reached in Arm B but not in Arm A. Conclusion: The saturability of dFdCTP accumulation in Arm A suggests optimal delivery of gemcitabine is achieved using fixed rate infusion compared to 30-min infusion. Fixed dose rate gemcitabine is active and feasible, supporting the concept of fixed dosing rate of gemcitabine in advanced NSCLC. However, this entails a longer infusion time with associated higher costs involved.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin Versus Single-Agent Gemcitabine in the Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Swedish Lung Cancer Study GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin Versus Mitomycin, Ifosfamide, and Cisplatin in Patients With Stage IIIB or IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase III Randomized Study of the London Lung Cancer GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Gemcitabine plus cisplatin vs. gemcitabine plus carboplatin in stage IIIb and IV non-small cell lung cancer: a phase III randomized trialLung Cancer, 2003
- Randomized Phase II Comparison of Dose-Intense Gemcitabine: Thirty-Minute Infusion and Fixed Dose Rate Infusion in Patients With Pancreatic AdenocarcinomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Phase I trial of fixed dose-rate gemcitabine in combination with carboplatin in chemonaive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a Cancer Therapeutics Research Group studyCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2003
- New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid TumorsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomised clinical trialsBMJ, 1995
- Gemcitabine in leukemia: a phase I clinical, plasma, and cellular pharmacology study.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1992
- A phase I clinical, plasma, and cellular pharmacology study of gemcitabine.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1991
- Saturation of 2?, 2?-difluorodeoxycytidine 5?-triphosphate accumulation by mononuclear cells during a phase I trial of gemcitabineCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 1991