The Non-Interventionary Norm Prevails: an Analysis of the Western Sahara
- 1 March 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Modern African Studies
- Vol. 33 (1) , 67-81
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022278x00020851
Abstract
Fears that the supposedly sacred norm of non-intervention in the domestic affairs of other states has eroded in the last few years are not entirely groundless. Excuses to intervene, that now receive sanction by the Security Council of the United Nations, include humanitarian concerns, as in Somalia and Rwanda, international peace and security, as in Kuwait and Bosnia, and the denial of democracy, as in Haiti, all of which differ from the interventions of the cold war years. As Thomas Buergenthal has pointed out, ‘Once the rule of law, human rights and democratic pluralism are made the subject of international commitments, there is little left in terms of governmental institutions that is domestic.’Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Morocco versus Polisario: a Political InterpretationThe Journal of Modern African Studies, 1994
- The Emerging Right to Democratic GovernanceAmerican Journal of International Law, 1992
- Arms for Morocco?Foreign Affairs, 1979