Damnifying Growth in the Antebellum South
- 1 March 1979
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Economic History
- Vol. 39 (1) , 87-100
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022050700096315
Abstract
The South's failure to industrialize more rapidly in the antebellum period did not lead to its immiserization. The South's terms of trade improved over the antebellum period so that its consumption potential expanded more rapidly than did production. Specialization in cotton production promoted a favorable movement of relative prices facing Southern producers. A customs union analysis shows that the South might have industrialized to a greater extent and might have raised its consumption potential further had it been able to impose an independent tariff on imports from all areas, including the rest of the United States.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The welfare effects of the antebellum tariff: A general equilibrium analysisExplorations in Economic History, 1978
- Returns to scale in antebellum United States manufacturingExplorations in Economic History, 1977
- Slavery and the cotton boomExplorations in Economic History, 1975
- Market Structure before the Age of Big Business: Concentration and Profit in Early Southern ManufacturingBusiness History Review, 1975
- Effective protection and substitutionJournal of International Economics, 1971
- Economic Sophistication in Nineteenth Century Congressional Tariff DebatesThe Journal of Economic History, 1970
- The Significance of the Slave Plantation for Southern Economic DevelopmentThe Journal of Southern History, 1962
- Internal Commerce and the Development of National Economy before 1860Journal of Political Economy, 1939
- The General Effects of Slavery Upon Southern Economic ProgressThe Journal of Southern History, 1938
- Southern Commercial Conventions, 1837-1859The Mississippi Valley Historical Review, 1931