Pain relief for neonates in Australian hospitals: A need to improve evidence‐based practice
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health
- Vol. 42 (1-2) , 10-13
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2006.00782.x
Abstract
To ascertain the extent to which neonatal analgesia was used in Australia for minor invasive procedures as an indicator of evidence-based practice in neonatology. A cross-sectional telephone survey of hospitals in all Australian states and territories with more than 200 deliveries per year was carried out. Questions were asked regarding awareness of the benefits and the use of analgesia for minor invasive procedures in term and near term neonates. Analysis was undertaken according to state and territory, annual birth numbers and the level of neonatal nursery care available. Data were available from 212 of 214 eligible hospitals. Of the total respondents, 51% and 70% respectively were aware of the benefits of sucrose and breast-feeding for neonatal analgesia. Eleven per cent of units administered sucrose before venepuncture and 25% of units used breast-feeding. Ten per cent of units used sucrose before heel prick with 49% utilizing breast-feeding. Expressed breast milk was used in 10% of units. Analgesia was given less frequently before intravenous cannulation compared to venepuncture and heel prick. Awareness and implementation of neonatal analgesia varied widely in the states and territories. There was a trend for hospitals providing a higher level of neonatal care to have a greater awareness of sucrose as an analgesic (P < 0.0001) and the use of sucrose for venepuncture (P = 0.029), heel prick (P = 0.025) and intravenous catheter insertion (P = 0.013). Similar trends were found on analysis according to birth number of the maternity units. Smaller units had a greater usage of breast-feeding as an analgesic for heel prick (P = 0.017). Despite good evidence for the administration of sucrose and breast milk in providing effective analgesia for newborn infants, it is not widely used in Australia. It is imperative that the gap between research findings and clinical practice with regard to neonatal analgesia be addressed.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Heat Loss Prevention in the Delivery Room for Preterm Infants: A National Survey of Newborn Intensive Care UnitsJournal of Perinatology, 2005
- Pain relief during common neonatal procedures: a surveyArchives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal & Neonatal, 2004
- Collaborative quality improvement to promote evidence based surfactant for preterm infants: a cluster randomised trialBMJ, 2004
- Survey of vitamin a supplementation for extremely-low-birth-weight infants: is clinical practice consistent with the evidence?The Journal of Pediatrics, 2004
- Timing of Initial Surfactant Treatment for Infants 23 to 29 Weeks’ Gestation: Is Routine Practice Evidence Based?Pediatrics, 2004
- Do we practice evidence-based care in our neonatal intensive care units?Clinics in Perinatology, 2003
- Sensorial Saturation: An Effective Analgesic Tool for Heel-Prick in Preterm InfantsNeonatology, 2001
- Prevention and Management of Pain and Stress in the NeonatePediatrics, 2000
- Can Adverse Neonatal Experiences Alter Brain Development and Subsequent Behavior?Neonatology, 2000
- Pain and Its Effects in the Human Neonate and FetusNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987