Bleeding and pneumonia in intensive care patients given ranitidine and sucralfate for prevention of stress ulcer: meta-analysis of randomised controlled
- 4 November 2000
- Vol. 321 (7269) , 1103
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7269.1103
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the effectiveness of ranitidine and sucralfate in the prevention of stress ulcer in critical patients and to assess if these treatments affect the risk of nosocomial pneumonia. Design: Published studies retrieved through Medline and other databases. Five meta-analyses evaluated effectiveness in terms of bleeding rates (A: ranitidine v placebo; B: sucralfate v placebo) and infectious complications in terms of incidence of nosocomial pneumonia (C: ranitidine v placebo; D: sucralfate v placebo; E: ranitidine v sucralfate). Trial quality was determined with an empirical ad hoc procedure. Main outcome measures: Rates of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding and nosocomial pneumonia (compared between the two study arms and expressed with odds ratios specific for individual studies and meta-analytic summary odds ratios). Results: Meta-analysis A (five studies) comprised 398 patients; meta-analysis C (three studies) comprised 311 patients; meta-analysis D (two studies) comprised 226 patients: and meta-analysis E (eight studies) comprised 1825 patients. Meta-analysis B was not carried out as the literature search selected only one clinical trial. In meta-analysis A ranitidine was found to have the same effectiveness as placebo (odds ratio of bleeding 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.30 to 1.70, P=0.46). In placebo controlled studies (meta-analyses C and D) ranitidine and sucralfate had no influence on the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia. In comparison with sucralfate, ranitidine significantly increased the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia (meta-analysis E: 1.35, 1.07 to 1.70, P=0.012). The mean quality score in the four analyses (on a 0 to 10 scale) ranged from 5.6 in meta-analysis E to 6.6 in meta-analysis A. Conclusions: Ranitidine is ineffective in the prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients in intensive care and might increase the risk of pneumonia. Studies on sucralfate do not provide conclusive results. These findings are based on small numbers of patients, and firm conclusions cannot presently be proposed.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nosocomial Pneumonia in Ventilated Trauma Patients during Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis with Sucralfate, Antacid, and RanitidineThe Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 1996
- Effect of ranitidine on intragastric pH and stress-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with severe head injuryDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1995
- Acute stress bleeding prophylaxis with sucralfate versus ranitidine and incidence of secondary pneumonia in intensive care unit patientsIntensive Care Medicine, 1995
- Optimal Therapy for Stress GastritisAnnals of Surgery, 1994
- Gastric colonization and pneumonia in intubated critically ill patients receiving stress ulcer prophylaxisCritical Care Medicine, 1992
- A comparison of the frequency of stress ulceration and secondary pneumonia in sucralfate- or ranitidine-treated intensive care unit patientsCritical Care Medicine, 1991
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Cimetidine prophylaxis for gastrointestinal bleeding in an intensive care unit.Gut, 1986
- ANTIBODIES TO AIDS AND HEATED FACTOR VIIIThe Lancet, 1985
- ON ESTIMATING THE RELATION BETWEEN BLOOD GROUP AND DISEASEAnnals of Human Genetics, 1955