Comparison of Time-tradeoff Utilities and Rating Scale Values of Cancer Patients and Their Relatives
- 1 June 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Medical Decision Making
- Vol. 15 (2) , 132-137
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x9501500205
Abstract
Because they are easy to administer, rating scales are often used as proxies for utility measures. The authors investigated the relationship between time-tradeoff utilities and rating scale values in two populations: 124 cancer patients asked to evaluate their current states of health and 102 relatives and close friends of cancer patients asked to evaluate health- state scenarios. None of the models tested effectively described the relationship between individual patients' rating scale values and time-tradeoff utilities for their current states of health. In contrast, both a plateau and a power-function model explained the variability in the responses of the relatives reasonably well (R2 = 0.56 and R2 = 0.58, respectively). Given that many respondents who were unwilling to trade off any time assigned rating scale values of well below 100, a plateau model may represent the best approach to adjusting rating scale values for health-state scenarios when it is not feasible to elicit time-tradeoff utilities. Key words: time tradeoff; utility; rating scale; cancer; patient preferences; quality of life. (Med Decis Making 1995;15:132-137)Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Perceived Adjustment to Chronic Illness Scale (PACIS): a global indicator of coping for operable breast cancer patients in clinical trialsSupportive Care in Cancer, 1993
- Variability among methods to assess patients' well-being and consequent effect on a cost-effectiveness analysisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- Methods for quality adjustment of life yearsSocial Science & Medicine, 1992
- Functional Status Versus Utilities in Survivors of Myocardial InfarctionMedical Care, 1991
- The validity of a visual analogue scale in determining social utility weights for health statesThe International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 1991
- On the receiving end — III Measurement of quality of life during cancer chemotherapyAnnals of Oncology, 1990
- Preferences for Health OutcomesMedical Decision Making, 1984
- On the receiving end—II. Linear analogue self-assessment (LASA) in evaluation of aspects of the quality of life of cancer patients receiving therapyEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1983
- Measuring the quality of life of cancer patientsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1981
- Social preferences for health states: An empirical evaluation of three measurement techniquesSocio-Economic Planning Sciences, 1976