Extramarital sexuality: Implications for marital therapists
- 1 December 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy
- Vol. 4 (4) , 279-291
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00926237808403027
Abstract
Although large numbers of clients approach marital therapists with concerns about extramarital behavior (ES), little has been written specifically about the implications of ES for practitioners. This paper uses a script theory framework to suggest why there are important attitude-behavior discrepancies concerning ES and how these differences may affect therapy. The authors also examine research findings concerning ES which do not support some widely held beliefs. This discussion includes a list of seven factors which therapists may utilize to differentiate diverse ES experiences and help couples clarify their values and intentions. Several case examples illustrate this process. Attention is also paid to the therapist's own values about ES and how they may affect therapy. ES emerges as a very complex phenomenon which requires a high degree of knowledge, sensitivity, and recognition of individual differences on the part of therapists.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Relationship of Extramarital Sex, Length of Marriage, and Sex Differences on Marital Satisfaction and Romanticism: Athanasiou's Data ReanalyzedJournal of Marriage and Family, 1977
- Extramarital Sexual Permissiveness: Conditions and ContingenciesJournal of Marriage and Family, 1976
- Open Marriage: A Question of Ego Development and Marriage Counseling?The Family Coordinator, 1976
- Public Attitudes Toward Homosexuality:Journal of Homosexuality, 1976
- A Multivariate Analysis of Female Extramarital CoitusJournal of Marriage and Family, 1975
- Some Correlates of Extramarital CoitusJournal of Marriage and Family, 1970
- The Cocktail Lounge: A Study of Heterosexual Relations in a Public OrganizationAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1967
- The meaning and measurement of ego development.American Psychologist, 1966