Why do accident and emergency doctors request X-rays?
Open Access
- 1 September 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Emergency Medicine Journal
- Vol. 1 (3) , 143-150
- https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.1.3.143
Abstract
A prospective study was carried out to analyse all X-rays requested from the three accident and emergency departments in Sheffield during one week. There were 3253 patients examined, of which 1028 (31.6%) were X-rayed, 1251 sets of X-rays being performed. Few X-rays (4.5%) were requested for medico-legal reasons. Skull X-rays were studied in particular detail. Only 5 (4.5%) of 112 films were subsequently reported as abnormal by the radiologist. The accident and emergency doctor's ability to predict X-ray outcome was not very good, their false positive rate being high at 21% while their false negative rate was low at 5.5%. This indicates that the accident and emergency doctors tended to be over cautious to compensate for their lack of experience.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risks of intracranial haematoma in head injured adults.BMJ, 1983
- Admission after mild head injury: benefits and costs.BMJ, 1982
- An assessment of the clinical effects of reporting accident and emergency radiographsThe British Journal of Radiology, 1980
- Rationalising requests for x-ray examination of acute ankle injuries.BMJ, 1979
- Reasons for requesting radiographs in an accident department.BMJ, 1979
- Radiology now. The Radiologist's dilemmaThe British Journal of Radiology, 1977
- Medical and legal aspects of the increasing demand for diagnostic radiology. Radiological Resources.1976
- A Coroner's view of routine radiology.1976
- Clinical and economic aspects of the use of X-rays in the accident and emergency department.1976