Conditional Versus Unconditional Procedures for Sample-Free Item Analysis
- 1 October 1977
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 37 (3) , 573-586
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447703700301
Abstract
Two procedures for Rasch, sample-free, item calibration are reviewed and compared for accuracy. Andersen's (1972) theoretically ideal "conditional" procedure is impractical for calibrating more than 10 or 15 items. A simplified alternative procedure for conditional estimation practical for 20 or 30 items which produces equivalent estimates is developed. When more than 30 items are analyzed recourse to Wright's (1969) widely used "unconditional" procedure is inevitable but that procedure is biased. A correction factor which makes the bias negligible is identified and demonstrated.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Numerical Solution of a Set of Conditional Estimation EquationsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1972
- Estimating Item Parameters and Latent Ability when Responses are Scored in Two or More Nominal CategoriesPsychometrika, 1972
- The Asymptotic Distribution of Conditional Likelihood Ratio TestsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1971
- Asymptotic Properties of Conditional Maximum-Likelihood EstimatorsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1970
- A Procedure for Sample-Free Item AnalysisEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1969
- AN ITEM ANALYSIS WHICH TAKES INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES INTO ACCOUNTBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1966