EVALUATING FOR COURSE IMPROVEMENT: A CASE STUDY
- 1 September 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Vol. 10 (3) , 254-264
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293850100307
Abstract
This paper describes a method of evaluating courses in which taking action is integral, that is, one in which the adoption of desirable change is built into the process of evaluating. This method starts from participants’ definitions of evaluation‐worthy issues and through a number of procedural stages enables them to refine, prioritize and reach a consensus on these issues. The process of evaluation is designed to motivate participants to improve their practice, the practice being teaching for tutors, learning for students and managing for course leaders. By improving this practice it is expected that appropriate change in the structure, content and operation of the course will occur. The arguments are illustrated by reference to the evaluation of a course leading to a post graduate Certificate in Education (PGCE).Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- The uses and abuses of nominal group technique in polytechnic course evaluationStudies in Higher Education, 1984
- School‐based Curriculum ResearchBritish Educational Research Journal, 1982
- “Dilemma Analysis”: A contribution to methodology for action researchCambridge Journal of Education, 1982